MooseLord:  @FrankietheShiv 2 months ago

ben gave props 2 months ago

EugeneBelford gave props 4 months ago

EugeneBelford:  "It won't be cheap, but then again it'll probably be less than a single month's payment on the M3, M5, or M6." Ehhh doubt it. 4 months ago

zilos:  I doubt it as well. a payment on an M3 could range around 800-1k /month and on the M5 or M6, its much higher.. 4 months ago

paulbreed_1 gave props a year ago

MooseLord gave props a year ago

rubensanchez gave props a year ago

teddywilkins gave props a year ago

scott:  haha a year ago

FrankietheShiv gave props a year ago

AndySchneider gave props a year ago

zilos gave props a year ago

Dochobbes gave props a year ago

eli gave props a year ago

MooseLord:  haha, that is awesome. That guy is my hero a year ago

MooseLord gave props a year ago

robdomarkas gave props a year ago

robdomarkas:  Sick guy :) a year ago

MooseLord:  Those morons in the truck were such a bunch of tools. They started it, and then they start bitching about it a year ago

jtoeman gave props a year ago

academik gave props a year ago

academik:  "there's a baseball diamond back there, we thought you might want to play" a year ago

Nicki gave props a year ago

Nicki:  Giant LOL ! ;D a year ago

ThrashCowboy666:  Canadians are always good for a laugh. a year ago

keen:  Put down the bat, eh. a year ago

EugeneBelford:  i thought i heard an "eh" or two in there a year ago

ThrashCowboy666 gave props a year ago

Cicada:  I assume this isn't actually real? Or do some people really have the lack of brains to follow a person around just to pick a fight? Wait.....yes there are people like that. So there is always the possibility of this being real. Maybe? >.> a year ago

conor gave props a year ago

AnthonyW gave props a year ago

guilherme:  Stupid guys... a year ago

JesseHattabaugh_ gave props a year ago

GnomeGarten gave props a year ago

radiantnode gave props a year ago

melody:  Some Canadians just ruin it for the rest of us. a year ago

Peha72 gave props a year ago

soren202 gave props a year ago

zilos:  sweet!!!...should give porsche and Audi a run for their money... 2 years ago

zilos gave props 2 years ago

DavidMcIntosh:  Yup! The porsche cayenne turbo S used to be the king of sports SUVs, but it looks like BMW may now claim that crown. 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Whats the point of an SUV that powerful? I can't wrap my head around it 2 years ago

AndySchneider:  same case as in the cayenne: profit 2 years ago

daverave:  if they switch to V6s I will be disappointed. I love that BMW is basically the only major manufacturer still making inline six engines. They are so buttery smooth. 2 years ago

AndySchneider:  that's the word. i thought porsche was still doing the i6's too. 2 years ago

MooseLord:  I doubt they will discontiune their inline sixes. However, the e90 M3's 4.0L V8 is actually lighter than the 3.2L i6 used in the previous gen M3. 2 years ago

daverave:  I thought Porsches were flat sixes? 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Most are. I don't think Porsche uses V6's. They are planning on a V8, which I am excited for. 2 years ago

daverave:  I believe that. It's an absolutely amazing engine. 8500 RPM redline or something like that? I'm just not sure how I feel about a V8 M3. It just doesn't seem ...right. 2 years ago

AndySchneider:  agreed. regardless of how i feel about losing naturally aspirated bmw powerplants i am all for leaving the horsepower arms race and returning to finesse 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Thing is, BMW believes you can get just as smuch speed from a turbo'd V6/i6 or even from a four cylinder turbo, you just have to make the car light enough--we're returning to a period like the '70's, where cars are going to be designed to be lighter. I think so anyway. 2 years ago

MooseLord:  They're probably trying to capture a certain sector of muscle car enthusiasts who are jaded by Detroit's current performance when fit and finish is concerned. 2 years ago

daverave:  I hope you are correct about the trend towards lighter cars. Anything over 3000 lbs. and certainly over 3500 lbs. is not a "sports car" in my book. It should also be RWD and have a zippy, free-revving engine. If you don't have to haul around 3800 lbs., you don't need 400 hp! 2 years ago

daverave:  Man, I need to make some cash so I can register and fix my 944. :D All this talk of sportscars has made me itch for a windy road. 2 years ago

MooseLord:  I think half the problem is the regulations imposed by most governments--the safety equipment imposed by most governments is pretty quick. But thats part of the equation 2 years ago

daverave:  You have a good point. However, modern cars are also much larger than cars of 20-30+ years ago. Take my 944, for example - about 2675 lbs., but it is not made out of space-age materials. If it was made out of aluminum and carbon fiber, using modern mfg techniques, it'd probably weigh about 2000 lbs. Then you can add 600 lbs of safety equipment and it'd be the same. 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Probably, but carbon fiber is pretty expensive, as you no doubt know. 2 years ago

daverave:  Yes. Sigh. I've had this conversation a number of times, and the reality seems to be that there aren't very many true sportscars by my (albeit very personal) definition. You've got the MX-5, Lotus Elise/Exige, S2000 (soon to be discontinued), RX-8 (also to be discontinued), maybe the Boxster if you stretch the definition, and? 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Well, I'd argue nearly all the porsche coupes would qualify, simply because of their design to minimize coefficients of drag. 2 years ago

daverave:  Sports cars don't sell well, it seems, except for the MX-5. Even that is a lot bigger/heavier/more expensive now (although, I think it is big enough now that I can actually comfortably drive one). 2 years ago

daverave:  I'm almost as big a Porsche fan that you'll find, but the 911's are just way too big now, and too fancy. IMHO. 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Haha, the MX-5 looks like such a fun car, bit of a chick car, but with a manual tranny, who cares? 2 years ago

daverave:  Agreed. As my friend (who has a 1997 Miata) says, "I drive a gay secretary's car, and I'm totally comfortable with that". LOL 2 years ago

MooseLord gave props 2 years ago

DavidMcIntosh gave props 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Nice, I love that body styling. 2 years ago

zilos:  thanks..i always loved the E36 body style...looks very european...but the new M3 looks sick too.. 2 years ago

MooseLord:  Yeah, I don't know. I like the new M3, but it's too generic, the older M3s are evocative of that rally-esque appeal of the 1970's Ms. 2 years ago

Brent gave props 2 years ago

AndySchneider:  whatever boris you photoshopped that body kit on there 2 years ago

Brent:  that is f*cking sick Boris 2 years ago

Jackson:  Sick car 2 years ago

zilos:  haahaa...ill drive it one day..when itpasses smog..lol... 2 years ago

FrankietheShiv gave props 2 years ago

mercuryman3a:  That is a lovely car. How much did it cost you? 2 years ago

zilos:  before the mods or after?...lets just say with themoney I spent on it, I could have bought a New M3. but where is the fun in that? 2 years ago

daverave gave props a year ago

zilos:  @mercuryman3a - too much with all the mods...sigh...but worth every penny..lol a year ago

teddywilkins gave props a year ago

MooseLord:  I really like that body style. Is that an E36? a year ago

zilos:  @AndrewMac-yes it is an e36. It has a rieger body kit. The side skirts are OEM M3 skirts though. a year ago

MooseLord:  Very cool, I thought it looked a bit modded. Fors the rieger kit help add stability? That front splitter doesn't look stock. a year ago

MooseLord:  The M6 is one of my favorite automobiles, it's pure badass. Shame the next model is going to be a twin turbo V8, most likely. 2 years ago

zilos:  yeah i agree..the M6 is freaking awesome....but I would get an M5 for the power and for the extra room.... 2 years ago